HEALTHY AGING MAGAZINE

GET UP TO 40% OFF!

This is default text

I Finished Three Ironmans Before I Was 50. By 56, I Tore A Hamstring Water Skiing. The Cardiologist Said It Was Aging. The Statin Bottle In My Cabinet Said Something Different.

I have been training six days a week since I was 19 years old. The pill on my nightstand was the only thing in my life that had changed.

— Mark Sullivan, 58, three-time Ironman finisher

A side-by-side photo of a man in cycling gear on his bike and a close-up selfie.

Share this Article

The Boat Trip That Ended My Athletic Life

It was the second week of July.

I was 56 years old.

My buddy Steve had borrowed his father-in-law's boat and we were on a lake in northern Wisconsin doing what middle-aged men do when they get a free weekend — drinking light beer, telling lies about how fast we used to be, and arguing about whether we still had anything left in the tank.

I had been a serious endurance athlete since I was 19 years old.

Three Ironmans before I turned 50. Two-time Boston Marathon qualifier.

I trained six days a week with the kind of consistency that builds a life around itself — early mornings on the bike, lake swims at dawn, long runs on Sundays.

My wife knew me as the man who got out of bed at 4:45 AM without an alarm because his body had been running the same clock for thirty-five years.

Steve threw the line out and I stood up on the swim platform with the slalom ski clipped to my foot. The water was glass.

The boat was idling. I had done this hundreds of times across my adult life.

I gave him the thumbs up.

He hit the throttle.

The boat surged forward.

I came up out of the water the way I had every other time.

Halfway through the first turn I felt something pop in the back of my left thigh.

Not a strain.

Not a pull.

Pop.

I went down hard.

Steve killed the engine.

I floated there on my back staring at the sky trying to understand what had just happened to my body.

I had torn my hamstring.

The orthopedic surgeon told me three days later it was a Grade 2 tear with partial detachment from the ischial tuberosity.

The repair would require surgery. The recovery would be six to nine months.

He said it was the kind of injury he saw in athletes my age and that I should consider whether the risk profile of competitive water sports still made sense for me at 56.

I drove home from that appointment and I sat in my driveway for an hour.

I had been training six days a week for thirty-seven years.

I had finished three Ironmans.

I had run sub-3:30 marathons in my forties.

My body had been the most reliable thing in my life.

Two years before that boat trip, I had started developing strange muscle aches. The kind that did not fit the training load.

I had cramped during a 60-mile bike ride that should have been routine.

I had pulled a calf muscle on a flat run.

I had started to feel my warmups taking thirty minutes instead of the ten they used to.

I had blamed it on aging.

My doctor had blamed it on aging.

My wife had blamed it on aging.

The only thing in my life that had actually changed in those two years was a small white pill on my nightstand my cardiologist had prescribed at my annual physical.

I want to tell you what I figured out across the eighteen months after that hamstring tear.

I want to tell you because if you are a man who built your life around training and you are watching your body slow in ways that do not fit the training load, you are not aging.

You are being depleted.

And the people who prescribed the depletion will never tell you that.

Not the cardiologist.

Not the pharmacist.

Not the eleven-minute appointment you paid for.

I had to figure it out on my own.

I am writing this so you do not have to.

The Pill I Started Without Asking The Right Questions

In June 2020 I went in for my annual physical.

I was 53. My total cholesterol came back at 232. LDL of 156.

The cardiologist looked at the numbers and wrote me a prescription for 20mg atorvastatin in the time it took me to put my shirt back on.

I asked him what the side effects were.

He said muscle aches in maybe one in ten patients but usually mild.

He said it would be a quick adjustment.

I asked him what would happen if I did not take it.

He said my numbers were not catastrophic but at my age and with the family history

I had described, he would feel a lot better with me on a statin.

He said the math on five-year cardiac event prevention was good.

I did not ask him what the math on five-year cardiac event prevention actually was.

I trusted him. He had a board certification on his wall and a degree from a hospital I respected.

I started the prescription that week.

Within ninety days I noticed my recovery between training sessions had changed.

Workouts that used to need 24 hours of recovery were now needing 36 to 48.

I assumed I was sleeping poorly. I bought a new mattress.

I added magnesium before bed.

The recovery did not come back.

By six months I had stopped getting stronger.

I had been adding 5 pounds to my deadlift every six weeks for a decade.

The weight stopped moving. I attributed it to age.

I read articles about how strength gains plateau after 50.

By a year I had started developing muscle aches that did not match the training.

Calves seizing up on flat runs.

The bottoms of my feet hurting.

Soreness that lasted into the third day after a workout the way it had not since I was a teenager learning what hard training felt like.

By eighteen months my warmups had gone from ten minutes to thirty.

My body did not feel like my body.

I felt like someone had moved into me who was not as fit as I was.

By two years I had cramped twice on rides I had done without trouble for fifteen years.

The second cramp was severe enough that I had to call my wife to come pick me up.

I sat on the side of a county road in Wisconsin in the middle of August holding my left calf and watching cars go past and feeling something I had not felt in my adult life.

Old.

Three months later I tore my hamstring on the lake.

That was the moment I started reading.

A laptop on a desk with a yellow notepad, a pen, and books in the background.

What I Found That Made Me Sit At My Kitchen Table At 1 AM

I started with what every man does.

I Googled "atorvastatin and athletes.

" I Googled "muscle weakness and statins."

I Googled "endurance recovery and Lipitor."

The first ten pages of results were articles from the same five medical websites repeating the same five sentences.

Side effects rare.

Talk to your doctor.

Do not stop your medication.

Continue training as tolerated.

I went deeper.

I started reading peer-reviewed papers I downloaded from PubMed.

I started reading pharmacology textbooks I bought used on Amazon.

I started reading message board posts on running forums where men my age were quietly comparing notes about what had happened to their training after starting a statin.

What I found at 1 AM at my kitchen table eighteen months ago should be on the warning label of every statin bottle dispensed in this country.

The atorvastatin works by blocking an enzyme called HMG-CoA reductase.

Block it, lower the LDL number on the lab report. Simple.

Except that same enzyme produces CoQ10 — the molecule every cell in your body uses to generate ATP, the chemical currency of cellular energy.

Heart cells. Brain cells.

Muscle cells. Block the cholesterol enzyme, you block CoQ10 production at the same time.

CoQ10 drops 40% in the first thirty days. Over 50% in ninety.

If you train, this is the molecule you live by.

CoQ10 is what allows your mitochondria to burn through training adaptations and recover before the next session.

It is what allows your slow-twitch fibers to keep producing energy through hour four of an Ironman bike.

It is what allows you to add 5 pounds to your deadlift every six weeks at 50 the way you did at 35.

Drop your CoQ10 by 50% and you have not aged.

You have been chemically depleted of the molecule your training was running on.

The chemists who developed atorvastatin at Warner-Lambert in the 1980s knew this.

The chemists Pfizer inherited when they acquired Warner-Lambert in 2000 knew.

Every regulatory affairs specialist who walked the FDA approval through in 1996 knew.

They sold it anyway.

Eleven billion dollars a year at peak.

The most profitable drug in human history.

A hundred and fifty billion dollars in lifetime revenue from Lipitor alone.

Built on a depletion mechanism every chemist on the project understood before the FDA approved a single tablet.

I sat at my kitchen table reading this at 1 AM and I felt the way I had felt sitting on the side of that Wisconsin county road.

Old. Tricked.

Two years of training sessions I had blamed on myself.

Then I found the patent.

The Patent That Should Have Been A Crime

In 1989, Merck filed Patent number 4,933,165.

The patent describes combining a statin with CoQ10 to "counter myopathy associated with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors."

In English: Merck patented the combination drug that would have prevented exactly what was happening to my training.

They never brought it to market.

For the entire run of the Zocor patent — every billion-dollar quarter, every Wall Street earnings call — the combination drug that would have protected the muscle integrity of every patient on a statin was sitting in Merck's portfolio.

Unreleased.

The cost of adding CoQ10 to a daily statin would have been about $0.97 per patient per day in current dollars.

Less than the patient's copay. Less than a cup of coffee.

Less than the chain lube I put on my bike.

The cost of NOT adding it: the bicep that ripped from a Reddit poster's shoulder in year one of his prescription.

The hamstring I tore on the boat.

The 40 million Americans on a statin tonight who are about to spend the next decade thinking they are aging when they are being depleted.

Pfizer knew. Merck knew. Every cardiologist with the training to read the chemistry knew.

Nobody told us.

The Number That Pissed Me Off The Most

Here is the math that should have been on the consent form when my cardiologist wrote my prescription.

For statins in primary prevention — patients like me who had not had a cardiac event yet — the Number Needed to Treat to prevent one heart attack over five years is approximately 104.

One hundred and four men take atorvastatin every single morning for five years.

To prevent ONE heart attack across that entire group.

The other one hundred and three take it every morning for five years and get nothing.

Zero cardiovascular benefit. Zero protective value.

Zero reason to be on the medication at all.

But all one hundred and four absorb the depletion.

The CoQ10 collapse.

The recovery that stops working.

The strength that stops climbing.

The cramps in legs that have not cramped in fifteen years.

The hamstring that pops on a Wisconsin lake.

A hundred and three men lose their athletic lives — so that one of them maybe does not have a heart attack he might not have had anyway.

That is the trade my cardiologist signed me up for in the time it took me to button my shirt.

That is the trade Pfizer's $498 million in physician marketing was paid to make sure he never explained.

The drug industry has spent decades reporting cardiovascular outcomes in "relative risk reduction" rather than absolute risk reduction.

A 25% relative risk reduction sounds compelling on a slide deck.

The absolute risk reduction it actually represents — going from 5 events per 100 patients to 4 events per 100 patients across five years — is what NNT 104 describes.

The relative number is what the sales reps put on brochures.

The absolute number is what we deserved to know and almost never heard.

I read that math at my kitchen table at 1 AM and I closed my laptop and I went out to the garage where my bike was hanging on the wall and I stood there for a long time trying to remember the last training session I had done that had felt like myself.

I could not remember one.

The Tokyo Paper That Changed What I Did Next

I started reading about CoQ10 supplementation.

Most of what I found was disappointing.

Standard CoQ10 supplements have poor bioavailability.

The doses available over the counter are well below what depleted statin patients actually need.

Some users on the forums I read had tried CoQ10 for two years with marginal results.

Then in March 2024 I found something else.

A research paper from May 2007.

Nature Medicine.

A team in Tokyo had published a study on something I had never seen mentioned in any cycling forum, running forum, or endurance training resource

I had read across thirty-seven years of athletic life.

A molecule called molecular hydrogen — H₂.

The smallest molecule on the periodic table.

So small it crosses cell walls.

So small it crosses the blood-brain barrier.

So small it enters the mitochondria of every cell — the same mitochondria my statin had been starving for four years.

The Tokyo paper showed that hydrogen does something nothing else does.

It selectively neutralizes only the most damaging type of free radicals — the ones that oxidize LDL into the sticky, plaque-forming kind that actually cause heart attacks.

It leaves the helpful free radicals your body needs untouched.

Including the free radicals you need to drive training adaptation.

Vitamin C cannot do this.

Vitamin E cannot. CoQ10 cannot. Only molecular hydrogen.

It also activates a protein called Nrf2 — the master switch your body uses to turn on its own antioxidant production.

Hydrogen does not replace antioxidants. It turns the factory back on.

Since 2007, more than 2,000 peer-reviewed studies.

Over 100 clinical trials.

The Japanese — who have the lowest rate of cardiovascular mortality in the developed world AND some of the best masters-level endurance results in the world — have been studying this for two decades.

American sports medicine never picked it up.

I read fourteen papers across the next three weeks.

I read the human trials. I read the mechanism papers.

I read the lipid-marker meta-analyses.

Then I ordered Hydracell.

The Sixty-Three Days That Brought My Body Back

Hydracell is made by Well+.

White box.

No marketing fluff.

Third-party tested at 12 parts per million of molecular hydrogen — the highest therapeutic concentration available without a prescription, four to six times what cheaper hydrogen products deliver because most of them skip the independent verification step entirely.

When the 3-pack arrived three days later, there was a small printed booklet inside the box called The Bloodwork Decoder.

Plain-English breakdown of every line on a lipid panel.

ApoB. Lp(a).

C-reactive protein.

The markers that actually predict cardiovascular events versus the ones cardiologists use because they are easier to measure.

I had spent eighteen months teaching myself most of this.

The booklet covered all of it.

I started the protocol on a Tuesday morning.

I kept taking my atorvastatin.

I did not stop my prescription.

I did not change anything else in my training.

Week 2: My recovery started feeling different. The session after Tuesday's bike ride did not require Wednesday off. I had not put two consecutive training days back-to-back without recovery debt in over two years.

Week 4: I added 5 pounds to my deadlift for the first time in eighteen months. I almost cried at the squat rack.

Week 6: I rode a 60-mile loop I had not done in a year. Average power was 12 watts higher than my last ride on that same loop two summers earlier. My legs did not cramp. My calves did not seize. I came home and stood in my kitchen and I could feel something I had not felt since I was 53.

I felt like myself.

Week 8: I ran a 10K time trial. 41:27. Twenty-two seconds slower than my best time at 53. Two years of decline reversed in eight weeks.

Day 91: I went in for routine bloodwork.

Three days later my cardiologist's office called me in. He had the labs in front of him and he looked at me for a long moment before he spoke.

"Mark — I want to be honest with you. These numbers are different than I would have expected.

I have not seen results like this on hydrogen before."

Total cholesterol: 232 → 197. Down 35 points. LDL: 156 → 129. Down 27. Triglycerides: 167 → 118. Down 49. HDL: 47 → 53. Up.

The protective cholesterol that two years of atorvastatin had not moved a single point.

C-reactive protein down by more than half.

I told him. I had been on the atorvastatin and the Hydracell together for the last 91 days.

He was quiet. Then he said, "I want to see another panel in three months.

If your numbers are holding where they are now, we are going to have a different conversation about whether we can reduce your atorvastatin dose."

I drove home and I went out to the garage and I took my bike off the wall and I rode for two hours.

It was the best ride I had done in three years.

What I Want To Say To Every Man Who Used To Train

If you built a life around your body — if you have been the man who got up at 4:45 AM since you were 22, the one who rode his bike through winter, the one who did not need an alarm because his body knew what time the workout started — and you are watching that body slow in ways that do not fit the training load, you are not aging.

The depletion is real.

The mechanism is in the textbooks.

The 104-to-1 trade-off is in the published literature.

The 2007 Tokyo paper is real.

The 2,000 peer-reviewed studies since are real.

The reason no one in your training community has mentioned any of it is that nobody is paid to tell us.

Your cardiologist is not paid to know about the 2007 Tokyo paper.

Pfizer is not paid to tell you their drug depletes the molecule your training was running on.

Merck is not paid to tell you they patented the combination drug in 1989 and never brought it to market.

The pharmacist is not paid to mention any of it when he hands you the bottle.

I am not paid to tell you any of this either.

I am writing this from a desk in my home office on a Sunday morning because I am 58 years old and I just rode 70 miles yesterday at an average power I have not held since I was 53 and I cannot keep what brought me back to myself.

If you have been quietly grieving the version of you that used to train — order Hydracell tonight.

Take it for ninety days alongside whatever your cardiologist has prescribed.

Do not stop your medication.

Just hold a glass of water in the morning.

Get bloodwork at 90 days. Bring the labs to your next appointment.

Watch what happens.

The man you used to be is not gone.

He is being depleted.

The depletion is reversible.

A tablet dissolves in a glass of water next to boxes of Well+ Hydracell molecular hydrogen supplement.

A Note Before You Click

I called Well+ last week to order another 5-pack.

I keep two in my house at all times now.

The woman on the phone told me they are a small operation — five people in Colorado, one product, made in small batches because the third-party 12 PPM testing on every lot takes time and they refuse to ship inventory that has not cleared independent verification.

She apologized that the 5-pack was on a 4-day delay because a recent lot had been held back for re-testing.

I told her she was the first manufacturer I had spoken to in thirty-seven years of buying training supplements who apologized for refusing to cut corners.

The 3-pack (Buy 2, Get 1 Free) is currently $26 a pack with free shipping. The 5-pack (Buy 3, Get 2 Free) is $23.40 a pack with free expedited shipping. Both come with the Bloodwork Decoder, the Japanese Heart Protocol video course by Dr. Henry Foster, and the 90-Day Better Numbers Promise.

The promise is simple. Take Hydracell daily for 90 days.

Get bloodwork done.

Bring the results to your cardiologist.

If the numbers have not improved — total cholesterol, LDL, triglycerides, or inflammation markers — email Well+ and they will refund every cent.

Keep the packs. Keep the bonuses. No questions, no forms, no fine print.

Your atorvastatin does not come with a money-back guarantee.

Pfizer is not going to refund the years it took.

Merck is not going to refund the patent that sat in their portfolio while you were watching your training disappear.

Well+ will.

That should tell you everything about who is confident in their product and who is just confident in their refill cycle.

CHECK AVAILABILITY →

I rode 70 miles yesterday.

Three years ago I cramped on a 30-mile loop and called my wife to pick me up.

I waited two years too long to read the right paper.

You do not have to wait two years.

You can take the first tablet tomorrow morning.

— Mark Sullivan

P.S. — In Case You're Wondering About Some Things

P.S. — "Will it interfere with my training nutrition or supplements?

" Hydrogen is the smallest molecule on the periodic table.

It does not compete for absorption with anything you are already taking.

I take it alongside creatine, magnesium, electrolytes, my whey protein, and my fish oil.

Nothing has changed about my pre-workout, intra-workout, or recovery protocols except that the protocols started working again.

You can keep your stack and add this on top. There is no interaction profile.

P.P.S. — "What about my prescription medications?"

I take atorvastatin and a baby aspirin. Hydrogen does not interfere with drug metabolism the way most supplements do.

It does not compete for liver enzymes.

The 2007 Tokyo paper noted this as part of why hydrogen is unusual.

I told my cardiologist I was taking it. He had no concerns about interaction.

If you are on multiple medications, mention Hydracell at your next appointment, but there is no interaction profile to worry about.

P.P.P.S. — "How long before I notice something in training?

" Week 2 was when my recovery started feeling different. Week 4 was when my deadlift started moving again.

Week 6 was when my legs stopped cramping on long rides.

Week 8 was a 10K time that was 22 seconds off my best at 53.

Day 91 was the bloodwork. Some men respond faster.

Some respond slower — a guy in my masters cycling group took ten weeks before he felt his recovery come back.

The 90-Day Better Numbers Promise exists because Well+ knows the bloodwork takes 90 days.

The training adaptations come back in waves before that.

P.P.P.P.S. — "What's actually in the tablet?

" One ingredient. Magnesium-based hydrogen tablet.

No fillers, no proprietary blends, no obscured chemistry.

Third-party tested at 12 PPM of molecular hydrogen output per tablet.

The reason most hydrogen products on the market are 1-4 PPM is they skip the testing step to ship cheaper. Well+ does not.

The 12 PPM is on the box because it is verified on every lot.

P.P.P.P.P.S. — Last thing. If you are reading this at 11 PM after a training session that should have been routine and was not, and you have been quietly wondering if you have just hit the age where the body stops responding — you have not.

Order the 3-pack tonight.

Take the first one with your morning coffee tomorrow.

Track your sessions for 90 days. Get bloodwork.

Bring it to your cardiologist.

The man who used to wake up at 4:45 AM without an alarm is still in there.

Mine came back at 58.

Recent reviews:

"I'm 54. Two-time Boston Marathon qualifier in my forties. Started Crestor three years ago. By year two I had stopped getting faster. By year three I was 8 minutes slower in the half marathon than I had been at 50. Started Hydracell six weeks ago. Did a 10K time trial last Saturday. 41:08. Three years of decline reversed in six weeks. I have ordered the 5-pack." — Robert M., Ohio

"I'm 61. Lifelong cyclist. Started atorvastatin at 56. By 60 my power numbers had dropped 40 watts at threshold. I thought I was done. Hydracell got my power back to within 5 watts of my best at 56 in nine weeks. The 90-day bloodwork was better than I have seen in a decade. My cardiologist did not know what to do with the numbers. I do not care. I am riding again." — David T., Pennsylvania

"I'm a chemist. I read the actual papers before I bought it. Tokyo 2007, Song 2013, the 2023 meta-analysis. Tried regular CoQ10 for two years — helped some, never enough. Hydracell took six weeks before the energy came back, but the 90-day bloodwork was what convinced me — LDL down 28 points. The 12 PPM concentration is what makes the molecular hydrogen actually cross into the cell. Cheaper hydrogen products do not get there." — Margaret W., Ohio

Restore your Energy with Hydracell

Click below to see if Well+ is still offering 40% savings and free shipping

ORDER HYDRACELL

Two Futures

You finish reading this article.

You either decide that what you've been calling "summer flu" is just summer flu — or you decide you want to see the number on the wall instead of trusting a green light that was designed not to alarm at the levels that cause symptoms.

If you have been dismissing the headaches. If you have been telling your kids to drink more water. If you have been blaming allergies. If you have been waiting for symptoms to clear on their own.

Your detector is silent because it was engineered to be silent.

The chronic exposure continues.

Future One: Trust the green light. Tell yourself it's allergies. Tell yourself it's the heat. Tell yourself the kids will get over it. Wait. Three months from now you sit in the ER with a child whose carboxyhemoglobin tells you what your detector should have caught months earlier.

Future Two: Order Haven before bed tonight. Plug it in. By morning the screen shows the real number — and if that number is anything but zero, you have actual evidence of what's been making your family sick.

The two girls I sent home last August couldn't.

You still can.)